Tuesday, 28 February 2012

LONDON SUPER COMIC-CON: Panel Parity



I spent this last weekend attending the inaugural London Super ComicCon at the Excel Centre in London’s docklands. A great show by anyone’s standards, and despite the (requisite) doomsayers in the run-up I’m certain the event will be back in next year. As is Correct Protocol at these things – particularly in light of certain Real-World shenanigans I shan’t bore you with – I spent a goodly chunk of the time politely swozzled in the bar. Embarrassing flashbacks and associated photographs are already cropping-up. But amongst the slew of wonderful humans with whom I connected or reconnected, this convention was also notable for a slight controversy I happened to create. And I’d like to tell you about it, because it Matters.

Let’s start with fellow writer, spiky-haired awesomenaut and all-round good egg Paul Cornell. As you may have heard, Paul’s been doing a lot of thinking about one of the Big! Important! Issues! currently troubling the comics industry: to whit, that women are invariably underrepresented – and frequently absent entirely – from the Panels which form the core of most conventions. It may sound strange to those of you outside the comicsphere that so much importance is placed on these little 40-minute chunks of Q&A waffle, usually conducted before not-quite-packed audiences, often with abstruse names like “Getting The Foot In The Door”, “How To Draw The Kirby Way”, or “The Importance Of Sequential Flow”. But in an industry composed entirely of freelancers, without Shareholder-Meetings, Executive Boards or even Watercooler Moments, panels are very much the public face of our tribe. And – with a few notable exceptions – they’re almost always a massive sausagefest.

A lot of people don’t think that’s a problem. The argument is that there simply aren’t many women working in the industry, so why should you expect them to be represented on panels? Which is… well, it’s a bloody lazy argument – there are loads of women working in comics – but, sure, okay, fine, let’s be blunt: there are fewer women working in mainstream superhero comics than men. True fakt.

Paul’s contention is this: if we comics-people want our industry to become a genuinely gender-blind place – that is to say, a place in which a professional is judged on his, her or its merits rather than the shape of their junk – then we need to do something about the elephant in the corner: the Where-Are-All-The-Women question.

Maybe it’s unrealistic to expect genuine parity. Maybe – let’s play devil’s advocate for a minute – there really is something fundamental about the medium of “Juxtaposed Pictorial And Other Images In Deliberate Sequence” which attracts male creators and male readers more abundantly than females (bullshit – there isn’t). Or maybe you disagree that with better gender parity would come a maximisation of the perspectives, approaches and ideas entering the comics world and that an increase in quality would inevitably follow (it would). Maybe you’re just not interested in getting more women in the industry, let alone more women on panels. But at the very fucking least we should all want to protect the medium we love from cheap shots and lazy clichés. At the moment it’s all too easy for the lip-curlers and sneermonkies of the world to dismiss Western Comics as the sole preserve of thirtysomething-plus men in teeshirts who never properly grew up because that’s the only face of comics they ever see.

Which is terrible. And I say that as a thirtysomething man in a teeshirt who never properly grew up.

Paul’s idea is that you can’t expect true gender parity in comics unless you create the conditions to facilitate it. Even if one has to dabble in positive discrimination, even if one must expect outraged cries of “tokenism!”, “political correctness gone mad!”, “patronising cockcentric condescension!”, it’s worth it. So Paul created a movement he called “Panel Parity” in which he planned to exercise the only real power he has – like any of us in the weird world of industry conventions – to make a difference. Paul pledged that whenever he’s invited onto a panel which doesn’t feature at least 50% women, he’ll surrender his own seat to a female speaker. Even if that means tracking down someone less “well-suited” to discussing the topic at hand than himself. Even if it means disappointing people in the crowd who travelled to the show specifically to see him talk. As long as Said SheGuest is able to contribute in some way to the conversation, Paul feels her presence on stage is more valuable than his own. Which is a brave and important and splendid thing to say.

As a result of the campaign Paul’s inevitably going to find it difficult to get invited onto panels at all. Being a nice chap he’ll invariably inform convention organisers of his intentions ahead of time, and they – if they feel unable or unwilling to shuffle things around in accordance with his 50/50 request – may feel it easier to simply UnInvite him. To its great credit the London SuperCon did its best to compromise on his behalf: gently removing him from a talk about DC comics, but placing him instead on an equally-divided m/f panel judging attendees’ cosplay outfits. A good start.

I’m not much of a Conventioneer, to be honest. The most I get out of the majority of these shows is the chance to meet some readers, promote a gig or two, catch-up with the industry zeitgeist then spend whatever quality-time remains with my industry friends in the pub. I don’t expect much – I guess I don’t ask much either – and all-in-all I’m a pretty terrible candidate for flag-waving do-gooding firebrandery.

But at the show this weekend I happened to find myself in a rather liberating position. I had nothing to promote and no material to sell, and had been invited to appear on a panel titled “How To Write A Comics Script” alongside a bunch of guys – men – whose reputations and claims-to-fame were all significantly greater than mine. It was vanishingly unlikely anyone attending that panel had paid to enter the show simply to hear me waffle about Panel Progression and Gutter Efficiency, and so I was to all intents and purposes disposable.

So I did Panel Parity. I spent some time before the session visiting as many booths as I could, looking for a woman who (for whatever my opinion’s worth) would provide the attendees of the panel with a valuable contribution. I didn’t want to hijack the event with a big flashy statement and no value-for-money, nor piss-off my fellow panellists, nor make the audience feel gypped – so believe me when I say I totally lucked-out by finding the exceedingly excellent and enormously talented Tammy Taylor. When I shyly told her what I was planning she jumped at the chance to appear, and promised to be waiting in the front row of the audience.

I warned the panel organisers what I wanted to do before just going onto stage. I felt like a shithead for being disruptive – particularly to the wonderful David Montieth of Geek Syndicate, who’s genuinely one of the Nicest Men In Comics and didn’t deserve the headache I might’ve caused him. But I was impressed at every step by how understanding these guys were – wishing nothing more than that I’d given them a little more notice (which, frankly, was the one thing I couldn't easily do – as Paul’s situation demonstrated). In the end I was allowed to open the panel with a little speech about what I was about to do and why, an apology for being disruptive and a promise I’d make myself available in the pub if anyone wanted to discuss “How To Write A Comics Script”. And then I invited Tammy onto stage, grinned like an idiot while the audience triumphantly welcomed her, and slunk into the Naughty Seat at the back to wait for my cheeks to stop burning.

The panel was a joy. If I’d had any fears about reactions from any quarter they were extinguished instantly. Tammy was articulate, insightful and brilliant. The other panellists – who had every right to be pissed-off at the interruption – instinctively and naturally included her in the requisite banter without weirdness or condescension, bounced questions back and forth, and were entirely Cool. I couldn’t have been happier with the way it turned out. The response, so far, has been overwhelmingly positive.

Would I do it again? Honestly, I don’t know. As I told Paul when we discussed it later, the idea might not even have occurred to me if I’d been appearing at the show under different circumstances, with a more clearly-defined agenda or more to lose. I’m basically a coward, and it’s easy to make a stand when there’s nothing at stake. What I will say is this: I made an instinctive little calculation that – to me, at that time, under those conditions – it was more valuable to surrender the seat than to occupy it. And given the cascade of support, and more importantly the slew of interest and exposure Tammy’s received, I’m not ashamed to admit I’m feeling pretty bloody great about the whole thing.

I would gently encourage other male comics professionals to give it a little thought before next stepping onto stage. Do you really need to be up there?

Go check out Tammy's WEBSITE, and find her on DEVIANTART.

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

A SERPENT UNCOILED -- Mass Market Paperback Edition

My latest crime novel, A Serpent Uncoiled, is now available as a mass-market paperback and a Kindle-based e-book (for UK and US readers alike). Relevant links below.

“With gargantuan literary flourishes, Spurrier evidently likes to roll his words around his mouth to test if they taste right before spitting them out onto the page. What you get are flashes of brilliance sodden by great gobs of wry humour.” -- The Truth About Books

“An elaborately tooled razor of a book.” – Warren Ellis.


UK purchasers:

Mass Market Paperback:



Kindle Edition:




US purchasers:

The KINDLE VERSION should now be available. There have been some problems activating the link, so if you have any grief – let me know.

And your best bet for the Paperback is the Bookdepository.co.uk, which will dispatch anywhere in the world without shipping fees.

ON SUCCESS

They say a thin-skinned writer is a doomed writer. I’d say you can cut-out the “doomed” bit and it still makes sense.

Listen. Like the rest of you, I’ve watched with mouth agape as X-Factor hopefuls and talent-show noddies are shredded by the collective ire of that most modern social-arbitration MustHave: The Expert Panel. Countless times I’ve wondered how it is that Johnny Crapvoice or Jenny Mankfoot could have arrived at this point – this needle-tipped moment of unimaginable ridicule – wherein it’s explained to them, live, that despite all their protestations to the contrary they in fact cannot sing, cannot dance, and in all likeliness will never again trouble a camera-lens with their likeness. That they are in fact worthless, talentless nuggets of gristle and fear, and that should the door Hit Their Ass on the way out, they will thereafter be invoiced for sweat-clearance. That the dreams of validation and idolisation they’ve been culturing since adolescence are so much bumsoup and that – thanks to the ritual humiliation they’ve just undergone – their return to vanilla mediocrity will in all likelihood be a shitload harder than it was before.

…And I’ve guffawed at these peoples’ subsequent denials or dejections or defeats, same as you, because, really, we’re all completely horrible. How, we’ve all wondered, do these poor sods get to be so delusional?

The fact is, they’re not. The fact is that we live in a world horrendously deprived of perspective. It’s a world in which no opinion can be said to be certain, and no quality proven, until it’s been hardbaked by the nuclear attentions and vitriolic judgements of a million people – or more. Increasingly, I feel that if someone has the balls – the rippling enormogonads – to test themselves against that compound-eye of consumer attention, then (sorry) they can be forgiven for overcompensating on the confidence front. For appearing to be so damn sure they’ve got the goods. These suckers’ve spent a lifetime being uplifted by the misguided love-compliments of friends and family, but… secretly? They don’t really know. They’ve simply figured out that in the game of Risking Everything, you might as well step into the light with a swagger.

Here the is unpleasant truth. Nobody truly knows if they’re Good or Shit until someone they’ve never met – ideally lots of someones they’ve never met - says so. Be they singer, dancer, painter, elephant-tamer, stage magician, wombat-tickler or, yes, yes, yes, writer.

Nobody wants to hear this: Reviews are almost everything.

Of course, reviews can’t always be trusted. That’s particularly true in this, our frothing Internet digirealm, wherein the stakes for reviewers aren’t quite as simple as “express opinion; feel satisfied at same.” It can’t be ignored that in the anonymity of certain online communities, a vitriolic savaging of the source-material accomplishes at double-speed what no amount of carefully-considered praise ever could: entertaining one’s fellow Internauts and endearing oneself to their collective.

In my other life as a comics scriptwriter – particularly with the bigger super-hero stuff – my fellow creators will often recite a simple brain-preserving Commandment (usually over the froth of a melancholy beer): Do Not Read Online Reviews. Even editors have given me this instruction: as if swaddling me from a toxic cloud of schedule-disrupting hatred which, counter-intuitively, doesn’t seem to colour the editors’ own opinions. Theirs, maybe, is the thickest skin of all.

I read the reviews anyway, of course. Some days I feel slightly as thought it’s a transaction of judgement: the reader has the right to express an opinion on the mewling literary baby I’ve left dangling and vulnerable before his face; just as I have the right to decide that his ill-use of grammar, obsession with exclamation-marks and evident lack of actually-having-read-the-bloody-work allows me to confidently ignore his opinion.

As long as you’re not shutting your eyes to everyone, the gestalt opinion is probably roughly accurate.

Let’s narrow this down a bit.

As frequent readers will know, my latest book - A Serpent Uncoiled - was released in largescale and kindle formats last year. And it received – honestly – some astonishing reviews.

“This is the most original book of the year, and it will take a work of staggering outlandishness to wrest that title from Spurrier’s claws.” -- BookGeeks

“A Serpent Uncoiled is a great book, but not for the faint of heart. Grim, gritty and atmospheric, it is certainly for those who like their stories with verve. With great prose and dialogue, Spurrier had created a novel that will I hope become a classic.” -- Shotsmag

“An elaborately tooled razor of a book.” -- Warren Ellis

“A unique protagonist, a unique voice, and a plot that sucks you in from the first page. Spurrier's sharp, brilliant prose is addictive.” -- Mike Carey

Thin skinned? I’m so thin-skinned I’ve never needed an X-ray in my life – the doctor just stands near a candle. Happily, it turns out that a crippling inability to insulate oneself from the judgement of others works in both directions. Upon reading all these lovely reviews I started to get excited. Here, I felt, was the tipping point to my career. A tsunami of hyperbolic praise and acclaim awaited me. Simon Cowell had waggled his eyebrows, pursed his lips… and raised his thumb.

That’s an amazing moment, for a fragile-ego’d wordmonkey. At long last one allows oneself a little confidence. You’ve sat and watched as the careers of your cherished peers have matured and tumesced all around you. You’ve secretly feared all along that you’re the mediocritite, the runt, the also-ran; doomed to be humoured and condescended by the giants of your circle. And now here, finally: validation! Not quite enough to become a monster – you’re not a dick, are you? – but ohhh that quiet warmth.

They say I’m good. They say I’m good. Oh god, this is really happening…



And then the book doesn’t go up onto any shelves. And the newspaper critics have got too many “big” authors to get through and not enough space. And the UK’s biggest literary retailer is in the middle of a crisis and isn’t buying anything – especially not creepy problematic Grime Novels by silly-named comicbook geeks. Oh, and Jordan’s got a new frilly-arsed gold-embossed wordcrime out, and Jeremy Clarkson just wiped his arse and published it, and there are at least four hundred soppy middle-class village-based mystery novels to be stocked before we come to the weirdo drug-taking brainfreak Private Eye stuff, and, and, and…

I said “reviews are almost everything, right?” The remainder is purely this: Attention.

When the trade-format edition of A Serpent Uncoiled was released, it staggered onto the X-Factor stage, nervous like a nun in her knickers. It puffed out its chest and gave its most confident smile. It prayed for glory and prepared itself for humiliation. And yes, oh gorgeousness and gorgeosity, Simon Cowell raised his thumb.

But there was nobody in the bloody audience, and all the cameras were watching for Cheryl Cole’s cleavage.

I’m not bitter, really. Everything’s a learning curve, in the end. So to all the readers out there I offer Perspective, and to all the writers I offer a freebie LEVEL-UP-lesson to save you a few disappointments:

The dream of becoming a writer is a fine and noble thing. The hoops one must jump to achieve it are fiery, vertiginous and smell like fart. There is no safety mat. No trainer. No chalk-pot to help you grip. And once the routine’s over and you’ve landed -- ohhh the relief!

But it’s all bollocks. The hoops never stop. They just change their shape from time to time. Quality, my loves, Isn’t Enough.

The paperback edition of A Serpent Uncoiled is out this week.

And if I want to sell my book – and you’d imagine I probably do – I’ve got to take responsibility for that. And, possibly, to get a little crazy. Behold:

Monday, 10 October 2011

NYCC – Where To Find Me

Once again I shall be joyfully maggoting my way through the proverbial Big Apple at this year’s New York Comic Convention, held at the Jacob Javitz centre off 11th Avenue. This year I’m appearing courtesy of those superb purveyors of Wrong at Avatar Press, and I’ll be most commonly found cluttering up their stall: booth number #1930. There I’ll be promoting the new “Crossed” comics we’re presenting in the near future, as well as various other more secretive projects…

On Friday 14th, I’ll also be signing at the Marvel Comics booth (#654) between 12pm and 1pm, and the 2000AD booth between 1pm and 1.50pm. Come find me for the scribblement and the gossipment in either location.

Look forward to seeing you there,

-Si.

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

London's Burning, Call the Engine

Like most Londoners, I’ve spent a long time over the past few nights glued to the TV.
Burning buildings, muggings in the street, home-invasions, cops with dogs. For me the apotheosis of Horrible was captured live by the Sky News ‘copter, as a woman in Croydon fled the back door of her home while the streetfront façade went-up in flames. She’d quickly crammed a few valuables into a bag and – as smoke poured behind her – staggered out in horror. Only to find several people waiting: staring . They’d been crawling across rooftops in the previous moments – trying to open windows, knocking on glass – and we’d assumed, shouting at the telly, that they were worried neighbours, trying to determine if anyone was inside the burning building.

They weren’t.
They watched the woman leave, hopped down from their gutters and sills, and – before she’d even turned the corner – poured into her home to grab what they could. They looked like nothing so much as a flock of vultures, watching lions slope off into the long-grass, frenzying onto a deserted carcass.

Even I, despite all that I’m about to say below, couldn’t help snarling-out a kneejerk: I hope the fuckers get stuck in there…

And that’s the problem. Or, rather, it’s one of the problems. The “fix it now” solution – calling for a violent response, clearing the streets, stop this! – is so much easier to contemplate and justify if one utterly ignores the more valid, and more useful, question: “Why did this happen?”

Keeping an eye on Twitter gifted me with a veritable blur of anger, rage, and disgust from London residents. All of it entirely understandable, of course: we’ve all been shaken, all been made to feel as though the city we love is suddenly a far less rational place than we’d always hoped. Most of us watched the student protests earlier in the year with at least a little sympathy. The kids may have gone too far in their rage, they may have become carried-away and strayed into obscenity, but at least their objectives – the nature of their fury – was understandable. (Or at least easily sound-byted, which is perhaps the same thing in today’s world.)

Not so our current vagabonds; these “troublemakers”, these “feral youths”, these “hoodies” – or any of the other collective nouns the newsmakers have taken to using. The term “protestors”, bringing with it some abstract legitimacy, was phased-out of the coverage even before the end of the first night’s trouble in Tottenham, which really was triggered by outrage at a specific event: the shooting of a local father by police. No matter how valid or spurious the locals’ complaint ultimately proves, we can at least understand a community reacting to a perceived attack.
Since then? The riots have spread. The family of the man shot in Tottenham has made it clear this isn’t part of their protest; this chaos isn’t occurring in their name. Consequently the empathy dissolves; the “plucky community Vs. tyrannical cops” narrative folds away like a bad pamphlet, and what are we left with?

“Looters”. “Opportunistic criminality”. “Scum.” People with no specified motive for taking to the streets, and whose justification is therefore divined from their behaviour.

Which is to say: smashing windows. Mugging kids. Stealing tracksuits and TVs. Emptying baby-supply stores onto park benches. And yeah: looting the burning homes of frightened women before they’ve properly left the premises.

Little wonder the Twitter-feed has become a howl. Little wonder the “send in the army!” brigade have been screeching at top volume. Somewhere, last night, Richard Littlejohn was masturbating himself into a smug-coma, sharpening his pen in delight.

Let’s not muck about, shall we? This post isn’t some fluffy attempt to justify the unjustifiable. Nobody in their right mind can genuinely rationalize the sorts of selfish, stupid, counter-intuitive violence we’ve seen as a legitimate protest. Nobody would defend these groups of boys – and girls – on the grounds of justifiable “social mischief”. And so London’s first priority must be to find a way to prevent this from happening every night. Sending in the army, as so many angry Twitterers have demanded, is about as awful an idea as it’s possible to have. Did we not just spend the first half of the year being disgusted by middle eastern regimes attempting to control their unruly citizens by shelling and shooting them? Did we not hail the “Arab Spring” as a victory of “lawless liberty”?
Yeah. Let’s shoot our own youths in the kneecaps, shall we, because we don't agree with their motives. Let’s see how the rest of the world respects us then.

Water cannons...? Better. These kids are being nothing more than opportunistic adventurers, and current control-tactics are clearly not working. The mobs know that if the police rush them they can quickly and effortlessly scatter into sidestreets and regroup at will. This isn’t some ingeniously planned scheme; no tactical coup enabled by that Modern Madness: the Social Network. It’s just plain old Urban War: the same thorny impossibility that left us with Haussmann’s fields-of-fire Paris. If you make the whole adventure a little more unpleasant for the mob – for instance, if they’re sopping wet – I'd be amazed if they didn't scurry-along-home a little faster.

Whatever the sensible tactic, it's clear that this needs to be stopped.

BUT.

There's a bigger problem here. That longer-term issue I mentioned before. The bigger picture. The difficult question.

The acts these kids are inflicting upon the city are abhorrent, but simply punishing them - or shooting them in the knees, or shelling them with tanks, or blasting them with waterguns, or whatever-the-hell you do - isn't going to stop this happening again and again. The uncomfortable truth is that our cities have created a generation of children who are too angry, or too poor, or too ignorant, or too fired-up, or too under-eductated, or too unintegrated, or too something… (and, honestly, I have no idea what it is) …to understand that this isn't how you behave in a functioning society. This isn’t how the world turns. This isn’t how we all co-exist in cities which don’t collapse under their own communal cruelty.

Until someone grips that nettle – identifies the fundamental problems at the heart of youth disaffection and tries their damndest to U-turn it, in the public arena and under political scrutiny (rather than sidelined into hushed borough-centric concerns) – these flare-ups are going to keep happening. And all the “community leaders” in the world, calling endlessly for More-Youth-Centres, aren’t going to achieve dick.

People: it's a lot easier to get outraged in the short term – clear the streets! get everything back to normal! send in the army! - than it is to be curious in the long-term.

Why are the kids doing this? It's not because they're "scum". Nobody’s born evil, people; that's a lazy explanation. Think like that and you might as well join Littlejohn and his box of tissues, or Assad and his tanks. No. The kids are doing this because they've grown-up to think it’s the Right Thing To Do.
Why’s that, then?

Friday, 5 August 2011

A Serpent Uncoiled: LAUNCH DAY



So! After what seems like a very long time, with a lot of hard work from a lot of very excellent people along the way, A SERPENT UNCOILED is finally released today.

My publishers and I will naturally be doing our best to create a buzz, and sustain interest until the arrival of the Mass Market Paperback in early 2012. Part of that buzz takes the form of reviews - of which we've had many; all frighteningly good. See for yourself. The other part of the equation is a simple appeal to you - the reader, the visitor, the just-checking-it-out Curious Cat - to give the book a try. I'm confident you'll find it unique, compelling; memorable.

If you like it, all I ask is that you tell your friends. Mention it on Twitter, post a review to your blog, whatever. Point them right here, to this page, so they can check it out themselves.

For Brits and Eurochums, here's the Amazon link:



And again for the Kindle:



I'm waiting on some news regarding U.S. access, but if you do find yourself on the Big Side of the Atlantic (or elsewhere overseas) and can't wait, the fine folks at The Book Depository won't charge you any shipping-fees. Which is nice.

UPDATE!

For reasons I don't entirely understand (am investigating as I type) it seems the book is already available on the US for Kindle. That comes as news to me, but I'm no gift-horse-dentist, so let's sell the hell outta this: U.S. KINDLE EDITION.

Thursday, 4 August 2011

A Serpent Uncoiled: Launch Day Review Roundup

A launch-day roundup of the reviews for A Serpent Uncoiled, if only so we have somewhere to point people while we kick-up an Internet Buzzstorm. As always any ReTweeting, cross-bloggenation and general word-of-mouthery is enormously appreciated. (Pointing folks to my website for clickthroughs is probably the easiest option.)

Onto those reviews. To date we haven't seen a single negative word spoken. I cannot describe how amazing that feels. (And that's not just because the launch party broke my brain.)


Quoth BookGeeks:
"With each elegantly sculpted paragraph, Spurrier refuses to be dictated to by the whim of the ‘average reader.’ As a result, those of us with the staying power have been gifted a book than fully deserves to become a cult classic. As of late July, this is the most original book of the year." (Full review here.)

Quoth Juniper's Jungle:
"It’s an intelligent and entirely satisfying read, particularly as the solution plays out for both Shaper and the reader. " (Full review here.)

Quoth Falcata Times:
"If you love crime with an Urban Fantasy twist, a flawed lead character and a twisted plotline that will keep you guessing then you’ve come to the right author." (Full review here.)

Quoth The Fantastical Librarian:
“A Serpent Uncoiled is a great book, not for the faint of heart, but very much recommended.” (Full review here.)

Quoth thetruthaboutbooks.com:
“With gargantuan literary flourishes, Spurrier evidently likes to roll his words around his mouth to test if they taste right before spitting them out onto the page. What you get are flashes of brilliance sodden by great gobs of wry humour.” (Full review here.)

Quoth WarpCoreSF:
“…his London is black and desperate, shot through with unexpected flashes of brilliant colour… his dry humour and unique voice make Shaper's London dark and fascinating.” (Full review here.)

Quoth Pornokitsch:
“A Serpent Uncoiled is a book about a man on the edge - of society, of self-destruction and of reality - but not over it. With it, Mr. Spurrier proves he's on the edge as well, taking the step from a promising talent to a great writer.” (Full review here.)